Ok, now we’re speaking the same language
Yes, the actual precipitation + remaining predicted precipitation for today is added to the “bucket” in the precipitation row. If the result at the end of the day (balance + irrigation + precipitation - evapotranspiration) is high enough, watering is pushed back. It’s exactly what’s been happening for a week now, each morning, due to the high precipitation prediction, Rachio decides to push that watering back, only to receive no rain for the day. Then the story repeats the next day. This causes the balance to be a constant 0 (0%).
I have water availability of 0.12 in/in, with root depth set to 6in and allowed depletion set to 50%. This means that the range 0-100% on the chart represents 0.12 * 6 * 0.5 = 0.36". The top 6" of soil can hold 0.72" of water, with the top 50% of that (3") holding 0.36". I understand how the allowed depletion works, it’s a weird choice, but you get used to it. Nozzle precipitation is about 0.52in/h, with an 80% efficiency. This means 0.36" at 80% efficiency and 0.52in/h precipitation rate takes about 50 minutes (0.36 / 0.8 / 0.52 * 60 min). Back to my problem, here are the observed facts:
- Forecast says precipitation is a-coming - albeit at typically 20% chance, for a total of 0.5" or more. 0.36" will make the balance sheet exceed 100% regardless of starting point.
- Rachio trusts that (despite the 20% chance) and assumes rain will compensate a watering skip
- Rain forgets to arrive, no precipitation, leaving the end balance back at 0%
- new day, repeat from step 1.
the lawn is therefore never watered. Even today, Rachio says, based on future forecast, that the next watering is June 21st. Forecast is rain every day, but so it was last week too. Still no rain, except for a 0.01" last night. 1.56" of rain in the last 77 days. Last real rain was 3" on Mar 23rd.
Possible solutions:
- take precipitation chance into account - dunno, maybe apply the chance % to the expected amount? More thought needs to be given here. A 20% chance of rain almost ALWAYS ends in no rain, or 0.01", or TRACE
- once future precipitation prediction was taken into account but not materialized, for the next watering chance, ignore the prediction once, allowing a watering to go through. It seems better to over water than not water at all?
Another example: last Monday, I had watered manually and the 5 zones with new sod were somewhat mid range of moisture levels, with no planned watering for Tuesday (I can only water Tue, Thu, Sun). I had hit Empty on all 5 of them bringing them to 0%, this caused Rachio to show watering the next morning, Tuesday. Went to sleep happy that this is going to work, woke up to only 2 of the 5 actually having watered. What happened was that the precipitation amount expected has changed throughout the morning and each schedule had checked it an hour before it ran. As the predicted amount dropped, the last two schedules in the list of 5 were allowed to go ahead and water. I am using independent Flex Daily schedules for each zone to avoid the problem with end before sunrise, where regardless of how many zones will water, they start at a time as if all would water). I’ve been observing this for a while now, and am pretty sure I understand the workings. Again, Rachio works with the data it has, bad data leads to bad decisions. Let’s try and account for bad data, is what I’m proposing here.
Thank you,
Adrian