Update? More than 16 zones?

Thanks for the clarification. We have been waiting for quite a while thinking that a software solution was in the works. This gives us a clear answer so we can adjust our expectations and frustration.

I wonder if there might be some reporting and maybe some better ways to do quick changes and see the overall results -including potential clashes. By the way your latest revision has helped move between zones and schedules quickly.

Overall, I stand by my statement that McKynzee referenced above. I have 3 - Rachio 16 zone controllers and while itā€™s frustrating to manage them separately it is much better than my old dumb clocks.

1 Like

Hi Franz, we had to face a very similar problem on a security solution. Customers wanted it, we built it, and we could not keep state on two boxes synched fast enough. Needless to say, nobody used that feature. However, since customer pressure was high, we eventually solved it - an entirely different way. We divided the box into control and data planes. We could extent the data plane over multiple chassis, but the merged data plane would only be controlled by one box. That worked amazingly well.

In your application, you could make the second controller a simple port expander to the first, but the intelligence would run on the first, only now with 16 (8+8), 24, or 32 zones. You could run something as simple as SSL/SSH link between the two boxes. One box would become a passive zombie and obey zone calls from the first box. The software already knows how to deal with 16 zones. It cannot be that much more difficult to add 8 or 16 more. You would have to develop a simple control interface between the two. Of course, a HW solution for gen 4 and some serial interconnect which automatically puts the secondary box in receiver mode, is also feasible.

The question for Rachio would be can you guys grow faster in the do-it-yourself small homeowner market by adding more features and beating the Hunters and Rain Birds, or do you go into commercial, become a supplier to contractors in which case zone expansion is a must. Of course, there is much more to it, like understanding the value chain or creating some form of managed service model. In any case, I would not underestimate the need of more zones, like us folks in TX which sky high water bills, relatively large properties, and hence many (often micro) zones.

I am happy to chat, if you want to brainstorm. Have been a product manager/designer/architect for many years.

ā€” Stefan

Do we have any update from the Product Management side from Rachio on the > 16 zones issue?

@sbrunner - if @Franz said he didnā€™t think it made sense for Rachio to go above 16 zones or tie together multiple controllers to act as one, I donā€™t think it is going to happen.

2 Likes

Add me to the list who would like to link multiple controllers or even just a controller with 24 zones. I purchased one Rachio a few years back at the recommendation of our landscaping company. They installed it for my home which has 18 zones. They combined 1 zone with another, and then put a separate ā€œdumbā€ controller on the final zone which was added in later years. They just installed a second controller so I would have control over everything, but they were not aware of the limitation on having multiple controllers. I am now in the same boat as many others. I live in a neighborhood with around 25 homes, with almost all of those having just as many zones or more than me. I am the only one with a Rachio controller, but I bet more would be customers if this zone limit was addressed.

I understand looking at your existing customer base to determine how to allocate R&D, but it might be erroneous to do so as you might not be taking into account potential new customer base if you add this feature, especially at a higher cost than existing units. A similar scenario to compare could if Amazon had said 10 years ago that they werenā€™t gong to put any resources into its third-party sellers platform because it made up such a small percentage of its overall revenue (now it makes up around half), or if Amazon or Microsoft decided 10 years ago not to invest in cloud resources because it is such a small percentage of overall revenue. That would have been a lot of lost revenue potential for each company. Those examples are extremely different scales, and Iā€™m sure there are much better examples others could come up with. Hopefully my point is clear.

I really like the product, the general ease of use, but really could use a 24 zone controller, or at least the ability to integrate my two existing controllers. (I posted this on another forum, but thought it appropriate here as well)

I expanded my yard and went from 10 zones to 20 zones. I would have liked to stay with Rachio, but not if my two controllers cannot work together. For any others in a similar situation, I advise taking a look at the Netro sprinkler controller. Multiple controllers can be controlled together.

@dblagent007, can you link to any info on Netroā€™s support for multiple controllers? Iā€™m curious as to how it differs to what Rachio is capable of. When you say ā€œcontrollers can be controlled togetherā€, Rachio does it without an issue. Your account can control unlimited controllers, either yours or those shared with you.

There are few advanced features for multiple controller support that is missing at this time, control is not one of them. Some of the things that would make a multiple controller support a success would be:

  1. Allow sensors to be shared by the controllers, such as flow meter connected to one would report usage when a secondary controller is active. Rain sensor is another example of this.
  2. Remove activation of the master valve, allow a secondary controller activate a master valve even if it is only connected to a primary controller without a need for an isolation hardware.
  3. Schedule combination. Avoid run-time collisions for controllers identified to share same water source.

Others may include to the above list, but that is what I can name of top of my head.

Cheers,
Gene

1 Like

@Gene, it is explained here. The answer to the question of what to do if you have more than 12 zones is:

The Netro app is capable of managing multiple controllers. You can link two controllers together. You will need to have at least two ā€œcommonā€ wires so that each controller gets one. If there is only one ā€œcommonā€ wire, it needs to be connected to both controllers by using a wire splitter.

Iā€™m not talking about how many controllers can be on my account. Iā€™m referring to running more than 16 zones in a unified manner, which is the topic of this thread. For example, if I have 24 zones, I need two Rachio controllers, but they do not sync with each other in any way. The Netro allows me to sync the controllers so they operate like one controller with 24 zones.

Seems like Rachio is no different in that respect, Here is the support article outlining multiple controller use:

In the link youā€™ve shared, Answer to question: ā€œHow do I add the second device to my account?ā€ states that ā€œthere will be a dropdown menu on the home page where you can navigate between the two controllersā€.

To me Netro is not doing anything more than what Rachio allows you to do already.

@Gene, youā€™re right. This article led me astray. I emailed them for clarification and it turns out they cannot be used to control more than 16 zones in a unified manner.

@dblagent007 thank you for sharing your research.

Interesting idea. (But I have a 16 and a 12 controller with 28 zones, so no spare zoneā€¦) Maybe I sacrifice one zoneā€¦

If you have room in your setup for a cheap relay like this (link), you can quickly setup master valve sharing between your controllers. Something like this:

Feel free to take pictures and/or describe your needs further. Challenge accepted :wink:

Gene

2 Likes

Iā€™ve got 5 bundles for 28 zones. The control valve is in one of the bundles. So at a high level, is this the architecture I should use?


Very much appreciate your help!

You are close, but missing a few wires going to the relay. Keep in mind that terminal numbers are based on the relay Iā€™ve linked to in my previous post. Here is the details of the base labels:

  1. An additional wire from the white common bundle to the relay would need to be made. Connect common to terminal 13 of the relay.
  2. Hookup the wire from the P / M terminal of the 16 zone system to the terminal 14 of the relay.
  3. Connect P / M terminal of the 12 zone system to terminal 1 of the relay
  4. Connect 24V- terminal of the 12 zone system to terminal 5 of the relay
  5. Connect line going to your master valve within your 1st bundle to terminal 9 of the relay.

You should be all set after these 5 steps.

3 Likes

Awesome! 2nd Rachio arrives tomorrow. And relay switch also I hope. Iā€™ll let you know how it goes.

2 Likes

So I think I got it all working. Thanks Gene!

In testing it, both systems seem to run independently simultaneously. Is that the correct behavior?

1 Like

I have two controllers wired with relays - works OK

Scheduling would be so much easier if there were a hardware or software fix to program all of the zones

I would spring for hardware in a second

PS my company also uses rachio for our buildings we would also spring for new controllers

It isnā€™t that difficult by two controllers the software allows you to have multiple controllers on one device just name the Zone something different for instance once you reached on 16 and you go to the next song on the next timer instead of name and its own one name its own 17 then 18 then 19 then 20 and name the controllers 1 + 2

Iā€™ve got a question I havenā€™t seen answered yet. Letā€™s say I currently have 18 zones and I want the 16-zone Rachio controller. I wouldnā€™t mind just disabling a couple zones to get down to 16. How do I do that?