Questions and suggestions about Rachio 3

This is a GREAT way to get started. I’ve done this and highly recommend others do this if they have time during the non-irrigation season in order to get a good feel of Rachio.

If as you say everything is equal, beats me! Maybe Flex Monthly waters twice as frequently and so waters half as much?

I don’t know. Watering time should at least increase with root depth unless it’s a wash due different nozzle in/hr values. I think Monthly tries to set the best fit frequency so that people can feel comforted by a regular watering regime vs Flex Daily’s as-needed regime.

This has definitely been brought up before in these forums, so you’re not alone in this desire for a better way to differentiate schedules on the calendar.

Flex Daily relies on the forecast to forecast crop evapotranspiration. That’s already basically a wild guess, especially beyond a few days, so I imagine using climatological daily averages to determine crop ET in the long term isn’t worth the effort? Note that I recall Rachio uses some variant of the Penman-Monteith equation to calculate ET and the daily inputs required for that might not be easily available in a climate almanac? E.g., wind speed, solar radiation and humidity? The availability of mean temperatures would be assured. Adding long-term calculations may also impact cloud processing time and add expense. Just spit balling here :slight_smile:

I wouldn’t change the MAD since 50% seems to be a well accepted value for most crops. The Soil Type modifies the Available Water value, which you can find possible useful values using the NRCS Web Soil Survey:

I’ve noticed this especially Yard vs Zones buttons. The constant refrain I hear is that redoing screen shots is soul sucking lol but yeah that’d be nice to see resolved since it means I have to add “Yard” instead of “Zones” button/tab to forum responses.

2 Likes